Saturday 26 August 2017

PROTECTING THE NIGERIAN MARINE ECOSYSTEM

The marine ecosystem is the largest ecosystem after the whole of planet earth because as we all know that water accounts for more than 70% of the earths surface.
For proper understanding, an ecosystem is describes a s the interaction of animals, plants and their environment and they study of how they interact is known as Ecology.
So it is no news that the human life is much dependent on the marine environment because we get some of our foods from the sea. This calls for the protection of the marine environment, because human activities can have a huge negative impact on the marine environment and endanger our entire future. For instance, the shipping trawlers has been found to destroy coral reefs which are important source of food nutrients for the fishes with the bottom of their trawlers. If this is not checked, it would continue to deplete the nutrients in the sea and therefore endanger our future.
This calls for a systematic mechanism to be put in place for the protection of the marine ecosystem.
This is so important that the DG of the Nigerian Maritime Administration and safety Agency (NIMASA), Dr. Dakuku Peterside, when he was speaking at a 2-day reginal conference on Marine safety and fisheries protection organized by the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) in collaboration of the Norwegian ministry of foreign affairs, said that the activities of oil exploration and the resultant oil spills whether onshore or offshore can continuously hamper the ecosystem.


In his words, he said, while tapping into the resources of our marine environment for economic advancement, care must be taken to ensure the preservation of the environment else wealth becomes useless if our environment is damaged.
So in the protection of our marine environment, we must adhere to the following tips to save our oceans;
Make safe, sustainable seafood choices to protect fishes that are depleted more often
Mind your carbon footprint and reduce energy consumption to reduce the effects of climate change which affects our oceans.
Use fewer plastic products. I need not explain this.
Do as little as you can to take care of the beaches.
Do not purchase any product that exploits marine life
Be an ocean friendly pet owner by reading pet food labels
Support organisations working to protect the sea
Be the change you want to see
Travel the orange responsibly
Educate yourself about the ocean and marine life.

DR. DAKUKU'S NEW CABOTAGE REGIME: PUTTING NIGERIANS FIRST


The essence of the Cabotage was to boost the indigenous participation of Nigerians in the shipping industry owing to the prospects and viability evidently being tapped by foreigners as at then. The government thought it wise that it was dangerous for the country to leave key players in the rich maritime sector to foreigners leaching on the industry to dictate the pace.
To ensure ‘Nigerianess’ in the countrys coastal and inland trade, the Cabotage act was promulgated in 2003 for home grown capacity for the sustainable development of the Nigerian maritime industry with four strategic pillars viz: Built in Nigeria, Owned by Nigerians, Registered in Nigeria and Manned by Nigerians.
This was seen as a silent caveat for foreigners to pave way for Nigerians to reap benefits that abound in the sector. To back the implementation of the act, a guideline was set to; Facilitate the establishment and development of national capacities to manage, monitor, establish adequate information system, develop expert human resources in Cabotage administration and enforcement as well as promote the efficient operation of the Cabotage regime.
As at then Vessels were not being built in the country and the restrictions included A vessel other than a vessel wholly owned and manned by a Nigerian Citizen, built and registered in Nigeria shall not engage in domestic coastal carriage or cargo and passengers within the coastal, territorial, inland waters, island or any point within the waters of the exclusive economic zone of Nigeria.
Importantly, there was the realisation of the fact that in order not to allow the nascent maritime industry to collapse due to lack of human and technical capacity, the need to create a leeway in the mode of waivers to ease the entry into force of the regime.
The act then vested the waivers powers on the Honourable minister of transportation to waive the Cabotage requirements for a duly registered vessel on the requirement for a vessel under this act to be built in Nigeria where he is satisfied that no Nigerian shipping Company has the capacity to construct the particular size of vessel specified in an application.
This waiver is seen as understandable owing to the notion that the country had not yet developed a large capacity to build ocean going vessels. However, the conditions of the waivers on building of vessels made
There were also other waivers that were seen to drive the ease of implementation of the Act but for the manning aspects which allows the Honourable Minister to grant waivers to a duly registered vessel on the requirement under a Cabotage Act that the vessel is to be wholly manned by Nigerian Citizens where he is certisfied that there is no qualified Nigerian Officer or crew for the position specified by an application.
The Act subsequently attached exorbitant amounts on the waiver requests to deter prospective applicants viz ship owners, shipping companies, agents from making applications as the Nigerian alternative would be cheaper.
Furthermore, applications for highly skilled crew such as captains, chief engineers, Chief Officers, first mate were made more expensive than that of their 2nd engineer, second mate, cooks e.t.c owing to the common knowledge that the number of Nigerian skilled officers could not adequately cater for the shipping industry needs because of the volume of trade.
Amazingly, because of the viability of our maritime sector, shipping companies prefer to use only foreigners on their vessels even for crew members as less important as cleaners not minding what it would cost them as waivers.
For a country in need of every kind of employment it can offer it citizens because its population! This was seen as unfairness to the Nigerian state because the country needed every available opportunity to provide jobs for the yearning citizens.
Consequently, the waiver on manning created a lot of unrest within the maritime sector as Nigerian maritime workers continue to ask for reasons a cook or a cleaner on the vessel would be a phillipino while there were Nigerians willing to take the job (it was their job in any case).
The Cabotage Vessel Financing Fund was seen as a long term solution for the issues that arose from Ownership and building of vessels, Registration of vessel in Nigeria was not too much of a problem for the Nigerian ship Registry while the manning issues continued to rumble.
To build capacity for the sector the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), floated the Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP) to tackle the menace of lack of trained Seafarers in the Nigerian Maritime Domain. This project has been lauded by major stakeholders and it has increased the interest and awareness of the Nigerian youths on the amounts of earnings in foreign exchange they might be missing by not taking advantage of Cabotage.
The NSDP step taken by NIMASA has been yielding fruits as a lot of young Nigerians are being sent to the best maritime institutions across the globe to study various fields in maritime and this laudable programme is now churning out graduates that would fill so many voids in the sector especially in regards to Cabotage.
But, there was still a need of political will to tackle the employment of unskilled foreigners on Cabotage vessels while there were Nigerians willing to take the job.
Recently, the Dr. Dakuku Peterside led Management NIMASA issued a notice of the temporary suspension of the issuance of waivers on Manning requirement under the Cabotage act.
The agency said it was no longer going to consider applications for grant of waivers on manning requirements for vessels engaged in Cabotage trade with regards to 2nd  Officer, 2nd Engineer , 2nd mate down to able seamen, ratings and stewards.
NIMASA further went on to state that applications for grant of waivers to a Cabotage vessel to be wholly manned by Nigerian Citizens in the absence of qualified Nigerian Officers or Crew for the positions of Captains, Chief Engineers, Chief Officers, First mate shall be considered based on Merit.
It is evident that the Dakuku led Managements repositioning drive is in top gear and the recently elected Chairman of AAMA has taken every challenge thrown to him by the Maritime sector on its stride. One wonders what Rivers state would be enjoying now to have him has their number one citizen, well that is a story of another day or story of NIMASAs benefits.
The meaning of this notice and its implementations is that instead of the Agency to be looking at the millions of dollars it stands to rake in by granting waivers, the growth and the development of the maritime sector is paramount to Dakukus heart.
Furthermore, it is imagined that by this policy and notice, the issues of unemployment would be drastically reduced because of the volume of the Cabotage trade. Also Nigerians would have opportunities to earn in dollars as their counterparts all over the world.
It takes a lion heart to effect changes and sure Dr. Dakuku Peterside has the lion heart to drive the Nigerian Maritime Sector to enviable heights with his repositioning drive. Surely the Nigerian Maritime sector is sailing safe have hands.
Take advantage of Cabotage!    

DR DAKUKU, IDENTIFYING AND CREATING OPPORTUNITIES IN THE NIGERIAN MARITIME INDUSTRY


Cabotage, simply refers to the transit of a vessel along the coast of a nation for the purpose of trade from one port to another within the territorial boundary of such nation. Implementation and enforcement of the provision of this Act have been the bane of the Nigeria’s Maritime Administration and discussions over the period of its introduction and existence in the country.

As they say, change is inevitable, as all other things in life, the Nigerian Maritime sector is a growing and developing sector, with promising opportunities. And administrators who must plot the affairs and future of this important sector are presented with these challenges and must find and adopt strategies that are promising because change is constant and occurring at an accelerating rate in all sectors, all over the world. We must all place our hands on deck to make this wonderful and rich sector open up opportunities for our people while creating more wealth for the nation.


It takes one with a great insight to identify and manage these seeming opportunities and harness them for the benefit of the people. That is why I revere the man at the helms of affairs at the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Dr. Dakuku Peterside, who has seen these opportunities and has made the required changes for the overall benefit of Nigerians and its government.
Therefore, moving along the change trend in the country and the Maritime sector of the world economies, the leadership of NIMASA, has done the unprecedented by issuing a Marine Notice to temporarily suspend the nation’s Cabotage Act provision on manning in the overall interest of the nation, in line with the Nigeria’s Local content enabling legislations and the vision that drove the introduction of the Nigerian Seafarers Development Programme (NSDP).

Within the context of the Cabotage Acts is the framework, otherwise known as the four pillars, which are that: Cabotage vessels must be wholly-owned by Nigerians; they must be registered in Nigeria; must be crewed by Nigerians; and must be built in Nigerian. These were the lofty ideals which the concept of waivers was introduced. It was to cater for the maritime capacity deficiencies in Nigeria, but with Nigerian Seafarers enjoying the first right of refusal.

Waivers grants thus became the ideal practice by the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) to voluntarily and intentionally relinquish or abandon the legal advantages, claims, requirements or rights over foreign vessels carrying out Cabotage businesses within the Nigeria’s territorial waters.

However, the regime had a caveat that demanded the engagements of Nigerian Seafarers in all associated pillars of Cabotage with the aim of aiding the growth of the nation’s maritime capacity, through placement of qualified Nigerian Seafarers in the mandatary sea-time training with Cabotage vessels.

It was the hope that the Nigerian Seafarers, upon engagement in the Sea-time training with Cabotage vessels, would be grounded with the necessary maritime skills needed to bridge the gap of maritime capacity deficiencies within one year of their internship, thus take over manning of such vessels. This was rarely achieved prior to the advent of Dr. Dakuku Peterside.
Dr. Dakuku Peterside, on arrival as the Director General of NIMASA, thus inherited a number of initiatives, programmes and policies geared toward ensuring the growth and development of the sector through optimal harnessing of the nation’s richly endowed maritime resources. One of such inheritance was the Cabotage waiver regime.

Though waivers regime had its benefits, but the fact remained that Nigeria and Nigerians were short-changed by foreigners who became the dominant force in the lucrative maritime space of Nigeria, particularly in the area of manning. This saw a large numbers of beneficiaries of the NIMASA NSDP and other self-sponsored maritime studies graduates struggling to have the mandatory sea-time trainings to qualify them as maritime professionals comparable with their international counterparts.

However, the leadership of NIMASA under Dr. Dakuku Peterside is changing the known narrative. It is engaging in formulation of a number of policies with associated strategies for implementation, one of which is the recently announced “NIMASA Cabotage Compliance Strategy (NCCS)” which is aimed at encouraging indigenous participation in shipping, particularly with regard to manning, which is the core of Cabotage waivers. It is instructive to reiterate that NCCS is not targeted at driving away foreigners, but to encourage full participation of Nigerians in the manning element of Cabotage pillars. It takes a man with a heart of flesh to feel the pains of seafarers and the unemployment level in Nigeria to take such a bold decision. To me, this is one of the best decisions in appointments, the APC led government had made.

According to the National Bureau of Statistics, “Youth Unemployment Rate in Nigeria increased to 25.20 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 from 25 percent in the third quarter of 2016. Youth Unemployment Rate in Nigeria averaged 19.20 percent from 2014 until 2016, reaching an all-time high of 25.20 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016 and a record low of 11.70 percent in the fourth quarter of 2014”. The periods of these statistics fall within the Cabotage waiver regime, which means that contributions of the maritime sector also impacted unemployment in the country.
It can also be recalled that Nigeria is largely an import dependent country, and this means that many ships will berth at the sea ports on a daily basis. It won’t be out of point for one to imagine the number of missed opportunities for young seafarers who are supposed to man these ships, earn an income and contribute to the growth of the domestic economy. This will cause a ripple effect in the economy in general by the import of foreign exchange which will in turn impact on the economy positively.
Therefore, NIMASA’s policy to temporarily suspend Cabotage waivers is purely in the national interest, as we hope and believe for a huge multiplier effect. With this strategic posture, the scourge of unemployment would be drastically reduced because the jobs which were hitherto done by foreigners would be taken by Nigerians, hence complement the Federal Government employment generation stride.
It is the believe that with NCCS, along other government directives and programmes like the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC), Nigeria would see a number of interventions, such as port reforms, development of the inland water transportation and encouragement of indigenous involvement in maritime business, which would in turn create jobs and reduce unemployment in Nigeria.
As an Agency of Government charged with the responsibility of ensuring effective regulation of the Nigerian maritime space, it is expedient that this policy be put in place to better position Nigeria and the Agency in particular to achieve its vision and mission to enhance maritime capacity in line with the best global practices towards Nigeria's economic development.
Manning is a core element or pillar of the Cabotage Act because every other pillar revolves around human resources. Without human input, building, flagging and ownership would be impossible, and so sound policies on manning are needed for the nation’s maritime breakthrough.
This may seem to be a herculean move, but from all indications, NIMASA, under the leadership of Dr. Dakuku Peterside, is committed and ready to ensure full enforcement of this new policy, notwithstanding the potential pressure and resistance the International Oil companies (IOCs), who were the major beneficiaries of the waiver regime, are likely to put.
The readiness of the Agency to ensure a holistic implementation of NCCS is evident in the intervention vessels which NIMASA is prepared to commission as part of the measures put in place not only to fight piracy and other maritime crimes, but also to complement the implementation efforts of the new waiver regime and resistance management.
It would be recalled that NIMASA recently issued a marine notice of temporary suspension of the issuance of waivers on manning requirement under Cabotage Act and mandated all Cabotage Officers to ensure strict compliance with the new directive. The aim of the NIMASA’s new waiver regime is to ensure a full takeover of the manning aspect of Cabotage vessels operating within the maritime territorial limit of Nigeria, by qualified Nigerians who are currently not being given opportunities by foreigners.
This is a step in the direction and marks a watershed in the history of the Agency. As Nigerians await the benefits of this new regime, NIMASA is poised to transform and position the nation’s maritime sector to be a major maritime contributor in the world’s maritime community.

Saturday 19 August 2017

Plastics debris and their Environmental Impacts in our oceans, a Situation Analysis Report




Plastic Debris in the Ocean reportPhoto: © IUCN
Plastic debris has now become the most serious problem affecting the marine environment, not only for coastal areas of developing countries that lack appropriate waste management infrastructures, but also for the worlds oceans as a whole because slowly degrading large plastic items generate microplastic (particles smaller than 1 to 5 mm) particles which spread over long distances by wind-driven ocean surface layer circulation. Growing scientific and public awareness is fuelling global concern regarding the impact of plastic ingested by marine species and the accumulation of plastics in coastal and remote areas of oceans (in trash vortexes or gyres). Private and public initiatives, such as the volunteer beach cleanups and campaigns for removing beach debris, represent the major source of information concerning the amounts and types of marine litter. The regular cleaning by municipalities and public authorities to maintain beaches attractive to tourists engenders major economic costs.
It is now well recognized that drifting plastic debris has several adverse effects on marine species and ecosystems. However, there is still a lack of precise knowledge about the quantity, sources, transport, accumulation and fate of plastics in the oceans. The most visible and disturbing impact of marine plastic pollution is the ingestion, suffocation and entanglement of hundreds of marine species. Floating plastics, which are presently the most abundant items of marine litter, also contribute considerably to the transport of non indigenous (alien) marine species thereby threatening marine biodiversity and the food web. These floating particles accumulate toxic pollutants on their surface during their long-residence time in polluted seawater and can therefore represent a concentrated source of environmental pollution, or serve as a vector for toxic pollutants that accumulate in the food webs (bio-accumulation of contaminants).

The shocking impacts of plastic pollution in our oceans




We live in an increasingly throw-away society, but what are the true environmental costs of our perfectly packaged products?

Plastic debris on the beach at Sharm el Naga, Red Sea, Egypt by Vberger

Since plastic production began in the 1950s, plastic debris has been accumulating in our marine environment. In just one week, from bottled water alone, it is estimated that the US produces enough discarded bottles to circle the planet five times. Such statistics shock and overwhelm me, that this represents the waste from just one product, from only five per cent of the worlds population!

So what are the impacts on marine wildlife? Last week, I attended an International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting to discuss the effects of marine debris on cetaceans (whales, dolphins and porpoises). A global intergovernmental body charged with the conservation of whales and the management of whaling, the IWC is increasingly undertaking vital work to examine the growing environmental threats to cetaceans.

This is not straightforward; with impacts occurring unobserved at sea, it is difficult to determine just how many animals are suffering and dying undetected. It is undoubtedly a welfare concern; we heard how whales entangled in derelict fishing gear can endure a slow, painful progression to death over months to years. And in the dolphins that strand on our beaches, in some areas more than 70 per cent have been found to have ingested debris and this poses a threat to their lives.

Sperm whale washed up on Spain's south coast died after swallowing plastic debris

The problem was highlighted horrifically last year when an emaciated sperm whale stranded on the Mediterranean coast was found to have ingested 26 plastic items, weighing more the 8.1kg, and covering an area of 29.9 m2.

Meanwhile, there is growing concern about the threat of microplastics. From the exfoliation beads in our face scrubs to fibres from our laundry, these tiny plastic particles are now known to be ingested by animals throughout the marine food chain, carrying with them a number of pollutants. In the large baleen whales, which filter huge quantities of seawater, the potential for them to accumulate high loads of pollutants is particularly high.

Of course, cetaceans arent the only wildlife affected  633 marine species are now known to be impacted. This haunting film Midway, by Chris Jordan, really brought the problem home to me. Even thousands of miles from human habitation, on remote islands in the Pacific, thousands of albatross chicks are starving because the parents mistake floating plastic debris for food.

What would happen if we could see these interactions occurring? Out of our sight, its easy for such problems to be neglected. But imagine if this problem occurred on land and we could see dolphins choking on our plastics and whales entangled, dragging abandoned nets for months to years before dying. Would we let it continue?

Across the globe, we need more political action to reduce waste streams and ensure they are properly processed. But this is one arena where we can all make a difference. By ensuring we reduce, reuse and recycle, by choosing items without plastic packaging and by disposing of waste properly, we can all help prevent debris ending up in our seas.

It may seem that youll be one in a million, but by not taking that plastic bag at the supermarket you are making a vital contribution.

The Threats of Climate change on Coral Reefs and the Marine environment


To lay a foundation to this topic, we need to understand what a coral reef is and its relation to the marine environment.

WHAT ARE CORAL REEFS
According to Wikipedia, Coral reefs are diverse underwater ecosystems held together by calcium carbonate structures secreted by corals. They are built by colonies of tiny animals found in marine water that contain few nutrients. In can also be described as a mound or ridge of living coral, coral skeletons and calcium carbonate deposits from other organisms like mollusks, algae and protozoans.



Coral reefs are very important in that they protect coastlines from the damaging effect of wave action and tropical storms and also they provide habitats and shelter for many marine organisms.

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT
There are two very importance of the marine environment and they are;
1 the most productive habitat, comprising 75 per cent of all known species. This unique environment, which remains generally unexplored and hidden from the world, plays an important role in regulating global temperature and is the primary producer of oxygen. Coral reefs, which comprise only about 0.5 per cent of the ocean floor, are complex three-dimensional structures built up over thousands of years as a result of the deposition of calcium carbonate skeletons of the reef building coral species. These reefs are often referred to as the "rainforest of the sea". This allegory underestimates the complexity of coral reefs, which have a greater diversity of animal and plant life than rainforests, circulate nutrients through the intricate food web and provide food at all levels of the food chain.
Historically, the sea has served as a major transportation network, a source of food and a favourite recreational area. Most major cities were developed along the coast as trading areas. The growth of these cities is manifested today in the percentage of the world's population (approximately 80 per cent) who live within 100 kilometres of the coast and depend on the sea for their livelihood (approximately 3.5 billion people).

2 In fact, the survival of the world's poorest people depends on their close relationship with the sea. The economic importance of the sea is evidenced in the ecosystem services provided by way of fisheries, tourism, coastal protection, and in its role as a source of raw material. This dependency on the sea is now threatened by environmental conditions brought on by global climate change.

EVIDENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE

The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) by the joint efforts of the European Union presented strong evidence that global warming over the last century was largely a result of human activity, such as the burning of fossil fuel, deforestation and the conversion of lands for agricultural use. Temperature records from as far back as 1850 show that the globe has on average warmed by 0.8° C, and further analysis has shown that since the 1970s each decade has been warmer. Global concentrations of carbon dioxide have also shown increased levels from an average of 280 parts per million (ppm) in the mid-nineteenth century, at the beginning of the industrial revolution, to approximately 388 ppm at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The global warming trend is expected to continue, as IPCC estimates that the global average temperature will be 2.5-4.7° C higher in 2100 when compared to pre-industrial levels.

PREDICTED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES

In order to assess the impact of climate change on coral reefs and the marine environment, we need to examine the predicted environmental changes and evaluate the capacity of the marine organisms to adapt to these changes. Climate models indicate that the sea surface temperature is expected to rise by 1 to 3° C, while the sea level is expected to rise by 0.18 to 0.79 metres. Regional weather patterns are likely to change, resulting in an increase in the severity and frequency of storm events, particularly cyclones. In addition, ocean circulation patterns are expected to be modified and pH is expected to decline as a result of the absorption of CO2.

IMPACTS ON THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT

Despite having taken millions of years to evolve, marine organisms, under today's conditions, must adapt very quickly to new conditions. Marine organisms will be affected by changes in two main aspects of their environs, namely, by changes in the natural habitat and food supply, and changes in ocean chemistry. Marine plants, mainly phytoplankton, are primary producers that form the base of the food chain. There is expected to be a gradual decrease in the quantity of these plants in warmer waters, effectively reducing the amount of nutrients available to animals further along the food chain. In addition, temperature is an important trigger in the life cycles of many marine plants and animals, and often the onset of feeding, growth and reproduction are synchronized. With these processes out of sync, organisms are likely to arrive on the scene when their food sources have long gone.

The anticipated increase in ocean temperature is predicted to stimulate the migration of marine organisms based on their temperature tolerance, with heat-tolerant species expanding their range northward and those less tolerant species retreating. This change in ocean dynamics will have a deleterious effect on species that are unable to migrate and could lead to their demise. Ocean acidification, or increased carbon dioxide levels which result in the lowering of the pH of seawater, not only reduces the abundance of phytoplankton but also decreases calcification in certain marine animals like corals and shellfish, causing their skeletons to become weaker and growth to be impaired.

Possibly one of the greatest threats facing corals, however, is that of bleaching as a result of increased sea surface temperature. Bleaching occurs when prolonged increased sea temperatures cause a breakdown in the relationship between the corals and their symbiotic zooxanthellae (algae). The coral subsequently expel the zooxanthellae, lose their colour (bleaching) and become weak. Some corals are able to recover, often with compromised immune systems, but in many cases they die.
HUMAN STRESSORS

The real challenge is that modifications resulting from climate change impacts are being superimposed on a marine environment already under stress from direct and indirect human stressors associated with overfishing and improper fishing practices, coastal development, sedimentation, land-based sources of pollution and marine pollution. This convergence of multiple stressors places the world's coral reefs under considerable pressure and it is estimated that about one third of the massive reef building coral species are facing extinction. Coral reefs all over the world are experiencing a significant decline. However, in the scientific community, it is believed that this decline predates the carrying out of detailed scientific studies. Due to their inaccessibility, the studies of coral reefs are fairly new when compared to other disciplines going back only about 50 years, but even over this short time span a significant decline in the status of coral reefs worldwide has been observed. During the 1980s and 1990s, the decline of coral cover was further exacerbated by the loss of the dominant algae consuming herbivores (sea urchins and herbivorous fishes), coral bleaching and coral diseases. Nowhere has this decline been more pronounced than in the Caribbean, which is now regarded as the poster child of coral reef demise. Data evaluated from as far back as the 1960s have conclusively shown the progressive decline in overall coral cover and the increase in abundance of fleshy algae.

WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS?

The options for tackling the issues related to coral reefs are twofold: adaptation and mitigation. Adaptation involves local research and conservation efforts in building resilience in the reef ecosystems through such activities as reef restoration, the identification of stress-tolerant species, the reduction of over-fishing and the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs). MPAs are regarded as the best management tool for conserving coral reefs and other marine environments because their no-take zones provide a safe haven for populations to grow and to subsequently replenish the surrounding marine environment. Adaptation, however, is not enough; a serious global response to mitigate climate change by directly reducing emissions, improving energy efficiency, limiting deforestation and increasing carbon sinks is required. At this point, mitigation measures are only expected to prevent further warming, as the reversal of existing conditions is now considered highly unlikely.

THE PROGNOSIS

It is now agreed by coral reef scientists around the world that the marine environment in general and coral reefs in particular are being adversely affected by climate change. Most scientists believe that the rate of change of climatic conditions is potentially beyond the capacity of coral reefs to adapt and recover.

The outlook for the Caribbean is less optimistic than for the Indo-Pacific. Research seems to indicate that the low sea urchin populations allow the algae to outcompete the corals for space. One possible solution is to maintain a healthy population of parrotfish to keep the algae population in check. Although research is being carried out, the ability of coral to adapt to warmer waters has not been shown for many species. However, scientists have observed that in some regions, especially the remote areas of the Pacific, where reefs are far removed from human impacts, these have shown resilience to an increase in sea surface temperature and bleaching.

With all the evidence pointing to the almost inevitable demise of coral reefs, there is now an urgent need for marine scientists to be proactive and engage the public and endangered communities to the reality of the threat. This engagement is essential if a change in attitude and behaviour is to be effected. Scientific knowledge needs to be transferred into practical solutions that will engender public support. On a wider scale, there needs to be collaboration between governments and the impacted communities in order to formulate and implement polices geared towards long-term sustainability.

Are we fighting a losing battle? Quite possibly climate change might have passed the point of no return. What is clear is that any solution to climate change is also the solution to coral reef recovery.

Notes

1 http://www.usgs.gov/.

2 http://www.savethesea.org/.

3 IPCC (http://ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html).

4 The Royal Society, "Climate change: A Summary of the Science", September 2010, p. 16. (see http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2010/climate-change-summary-science/).

5 Przeslawski, R. et al. (2008). "Beyond Corals and Fish: The Effects of Climate Change on Non-coral Benthic Invertebrates of Tropical Reefs", Global Change Biology (2008) 14, 2773-2795, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01693.x.

6 IPCC (http://ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/contents.html).

7 Jackson, J. 2012. "The Future of Coral and Coral Reefs in a Rapidly Changing World", International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July 2012.

8 C. Wilkinson (ed.) (2004). "Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2004", Vol. 1 and 2. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

9 Wilkinson, C., Souter, D. (eds.) (2008). "Status of Caribbean Coral Reefs after Bleaching and Hurricanes in 2005", Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre, Townsville, p. 152.

10 Sweatman, H. et al. (2011). "Assessing loss of coral cover on Australia's Great Barrier Reef over two decades, with implications for longer-term trends", Coral Reefs (2011) 30:521-531. DOI 10.1007/s00338-010-0715-1.

11 Gardner et al. (2003). "Long-term region-wide decline in Caribbean Corals", Science 301:958-960.

12 Jackson, J. (2012). "The Future of Coral and Coral Reefs in a Rapidly Changing World", International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July 2012.

13 Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2012). "Coral reefs and global change: where do the solutions lie?", International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July 2012.

14 Hughes, T. et al. (2003). "Climate Change, Human Impacts, And the Resilience of Coral Reefs Science", 301, 929 (2003). DOI: 10.1126/science.1085046.

15 Lowe, J. A.; et al. (2009). "How Difficult Is It To Recover from Dangerous Levels of Global Warming?" Environmental Research Letters 4:014012. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014012.

16 Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2012). "Coral Reefs and Global Change: Where do the solutions lie?", International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 9-13 July 2012.

Thursday 17 August 2017

The impact of Humans on the Marine Environment

Human impacts on marine environment
Throughout human existence we have relied on the oceans  for food, as a waste dump, for recreation, for economic opportunities and so on. However, its not only our activities in the marine environment that affect life in the sea  its also the things we do on land.


Commercial fishing boat
Fishing was probably the first use of the oceans by humans. In the last century, significant increases in commercial fishing have resulted in the over-exploitation of many fish stocks. Some are feared to be extinct.

The international Maritime Organization estimates that more than half the worlds population now live within 100 kilometers of the coast, its not surprising that the activities of humans have taken their toll on the fish population. Human impacts have increased along with our rapid population growth, substantial developments in technology and significant changes in land use. Over-fishing, pollution and introduced species are affecting life in the sea  and Nigeria is no exception!

Fisheries

Humans living near the coast have probably always used the ocean as a source of food. However, with advances in fishing equipment, larger ships and new tracking technologies, many fish stocks around the world have reduced significantly. Fish stocks on continental shelf areas are now widely considered to be fully or over exploited. Aside from reducing fish stocks, unsustainable fishing practices can have other negative impacts on the marine environment. For example, some fishing techniques such as dredging and trawling can cause widespread damage to marine habitats and organisms living on the sea floor. These techniques also often capture non-target species (known as by-catch) that are then discarded.

Unlike many other countries where fisheries are managed by quota system placing limits on certain kinds of endangered species, In Nigeria, the story is different where such limits does not exist.

Pollution

Our oceans have long been used as an intentional dumping ground for all sorts of waste including sewage, industrial run-off and chemicals. In more recent times, policy changes in many countries have reflected the view that the ocean does not have an infinite capacity to absorb our waste. However, marine pollution remains a major problem and threatens life in the sea at all levels.
Some marine pollution may be accidental, for example, oil spills caused by tanker accidents. Some may be indirect, when pollutants from our communities flow out to sea via stormwater drains and rivers. Some effects may not be immediately obvious, for example, bioaccumulation  the process where levels of toxic chemicals in organisms increase as they eat each other at each successive trophic level in the food web.

All marine pollution has the potential to seriously damage marine habitats and life in the sea. Scientists are concerned that marine pollution places extra stress on organisms that are already threatened or endangered.
In Nigeria, sea pollution is a major threat to organisms living in the sea. Poor environmental systems affect the way waste is managed, especially residents who live in the south of the country who tend to dump refuse at waterways when rain falls and expect the rain to move the waste to the sea. This explains the large number of plastic debris that abound our seashore.

Eutrophication

According to the scientists at the international institute of maritime, Sweden, Eutrophication is the result of a particular type of marine pollution. It is caused by the release of excess nutrients into coastal areas via streams and rivers. These nutrients come from fertilisers used in intensive farming practices on land. Additional nutrients in the sea can lead to excessive phytoplankton growth that results in blooms. When these large numbers of organisms die, the sharp increase in decomposition of the dead organisms by oxygen-using bacteria depletes oxygen levels. In some cases, this can result in the death by oxygen starvation of large numbers of other organisms such as fish. Oxygen is essential even in the sea and laws has to be in place to curb such activities that stifle maritime organism.

Introduced species
Introduced species are unwanted marine Organisms. In Nigeria, introduced species in our terrestrial ecosystems have contributed to a significant loss of biodiversity. Introduced species also present a threat to our marine environment. It is not always easy to monitor or prevent the introduction of unwanted marine organisms, and visiting ships may introduce them accidentally on their hulls, in ballast water or on equipment.

Not all introduced species will spread or even survive, but once established, they may be difficult or impossible to remove. For instance, the Japanese seaweed, wakame Undaria pinnatifida, which probably arrived in 1987, is now widespread. Scientists are still monitoring its impact on their native marine organisms.

Ocean acidification

There is evidence to suggest that human activities have caused the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere to rise dramatically. This impacts on the marine environment as the worlds oceans currently absorb as much as a third of all Carbon dioxide emissions in our atmosphere. This absorption of Carbon dioxide causes the pH to decrease, resulting in the seawater becoming more acidic.

Our role in ocean acidification

Scientists have long understood that an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will result in higher levels of dissolved Carbondioxide in seawater. However, a relatively recent discovery is that even small changes in water pH can have big impacts on marine biology. Ocean acidification is a worldwide issue, but as Carbondioxide is more soluble in colder water, it is of particular concern in cold temperate oceans.

It is difficult to predict the overall impact on the marine ecosystem but many scientists fear that ocean acidification has the potential to decrease marine biodiversity on a very large scale.

RESOURCES
Visit the Department of Conservations website to find out more about marine reserves and other efforts being made to protect life in the sea.

Forest and Bird publish the Best Fish Guide to help New Zealanders make sustainable choices when buying seafood.

Abducted 5 members of maritime workers union, others regain freedom

The eight Nigerians, among them five members of the Maritime Workers of Nigeria (MWUN) kidnaped by gunmen  in Rivers State waters on Monday ...